Effect of aging on esophageal motility in patients with and without GERD

Background/Aims: The impact of aging on esophageal motility is not completely understood. This study aims at assessing 1) whether degeneration of esophageal body motility occurs with age and 2) whether this development is influenced by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Effect of aging on esophageal motility in patients with and without GERD

Background/Aims: The impact of aging on esophageal motility is not completely understood. This study aims at assessing 1) whether degeneration of esophageal body motility occurs with age and 2) whether this development is influenced by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Impact of Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy with External Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background. A variety of different techniques are established for the management of the pancreatic remnant after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although pancreaticojejunostomy is one of the most favored methods, technical details are still under discussion. We report about a series of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomies with total external drainage of the pancreaticduct. Patients and Methods. Between 1998 and 2007 257 patients underwent surgical therapy for malignant disease of the pancreas and the periampullary region and for chronic pancreatitis. Of these, 153 partial pancreaticoduodenectomies (85 pylorus preserving resections and 68 Whipple's procedures) were performed. In all of these cases, the pancreatic remnant was drained by a duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with external drainage of the pancreatic duct. Presence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). Results. Postoperative mortality was 1.9%. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) was 19.6% according to the ISGPF criteria. Only one patient required re-laparotomy for complications caused by PPF. Patients with PPF had a significantly longer operation time (7.3 h versus 6.6 h; P = 0.041). Incidence of PPF was not influenced by histology. In all cases the fistulas resolved under conservative treatment. Conclusion. Duct-to-mucosa PJ with external drainage is a safe procedure to enteralize the pancreatic stump after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Prognostic Relevance of Skip Metastases in Esophageal Cancer

Background. Presence of nodal skip metastasis is an established prognostic factor for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Little is known about this form of lymphatic spread in esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess nodal skip metastasis and its clinical importance for patients with cancer of the esophagus. Methods. Resected lymph nodes of 128 patients with esophageal cancer and pN1 status (adenocarcinoma, n = 67; squamous cell cancer, n = 61) were mapped according to the Japanese lymph-node classification for esophageal cancer. Skip metastases were defined as tumor-free N1 lymph nodes, whereas N2 through N4 lymph nodes harbor metastases. Results. Skip metastases were present in 26 of 128 (20%) patients. There was a higher rate of skip metastasis in early tumors (39% versus 23% versus 14% for T1, T2, and T3 tumors; p = 0.032) and tumors in the middle and upper third of the esophagus (37% versus 15% for upper- and middle-third and lower-third tumors; p = 0.022). Patients with skip metastasis had a significantly better 5-year survival rate than patients with continuous metastasis (53% versus 15%; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed skip metastasis as an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions. Skip metastasis is a common form of lymphatic spread in esophageal cancer, which is associated with a favorable prognosis. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:1662-8) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeon

Extracapsular Lymph Node Spread as a Negative Prognostic Factor of Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas and Cancer of the Papilla of Vater

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and impact of extracapsular lymph node spread (ELNS) in pancreatic cancer (PC) and cancer of the papilla of Vater (CPV). Methods Between 2004 and 2009, 148 patients underwent surgical therapy for PC (n = 112) and CPV (n = 36). The resected lymph nodes (LNs) were further analyzed for ELNS. Results In 95 (64.2%) patients, LN metastasis was present. In 45 (47.3%) of these patients, an ELNS was present on histopathology. The patients' survival was negatively affected by ELNS. For PC, the 5-year survival rate was 37% for patients with no LN metastasis compared with 4% and 0% for patients with LN metastasis (pN1) but without extracapsular LN involvement and patients with pN1 disease with extracapsular LN involvement of at least 1 LN, respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with CPV, the 5-year survival rate was 56% for patients with no LN metastasis and 44% and 0% for patients with pN1 disease but without extracapsular LN involvement and patients with pN1 disease with extracapsular LN involvement of at least 1 LN, respectively (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed ELNS as an independent prognostic factor of survival for both tumor types. Conclusions Extracapsular LN spread is an independent negative prognostic factor in PC and CPV. In future staging systems, ELNS should be included

High Expression of HIF1a Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas and Correlated to PDGFA, VEGF, and bFGF

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer still has one of the worst prognoses in gastrointestinal cancers with a 5-year survival rate of 5%, making it necessary to find markers or gene sets that would further classify patients into different risk categories and thus allow more individually adapted multimodality treatment regimens. In this study, we investigated the prognostic values of HIF1a, bFGF, VEGF, and PDGFA gene expressions as well as their interrelationships. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were obtained from 41 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (age, 65; range, 34–85 years). After laser capture microdissection, direct quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays were performed in triplicates to determine HIF1a, PDGFA, VEGF, and bFGF gene expression levels. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the impact of HIF1a gene expression on prognosis. RESULTS:HIF1a was significantly correlated to every gene we tested: bFGF (P = .04), VEGF (P = .02), and PDGFA (P = .03). Tumor size, P = .04, and high HIF1a mRNA expression (cutoff, 75th percentile) had a significant impact on survival, P = .009 (overall model fit, P = .02). High HIF1a expression had a sensitivity of 87.1% and a specificity of 55.6% for the diagnosis short (<6 months) versus long (6–60 months) survival. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring PDGFA, bFGF, and HIF1a expression may contribute to a better understanding of the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer and may even play a crucial role for the distribution of patients to multimodal therapeutic regimens. Larger studies including patients treated with actual chemotherapeutics seem to be warranted